Today, at the third reading of The Assisted Dying Bill, I voted against The Motion.
Since MPs last considered The Bill in May, I have not been reassured that subsequent amendments will sufficiently protect the most vulnerable in our society. I know many constituents are also concerned that The Bill will pose immense dangers to those with mental health illness.
Therefore, my position remains unchanged.
The House of Commons passed the Bill by 23 votes with 313 voting for it and 291 against. The Bill will now go to the House of Lords for further scrutiny and I will be following legislative progress closely.
Ever since The Bill's introduction, I have continued to think deeply about this highly emotive issue, and I have often spoken with constituents and representatives of different interest groups about the proposal. After giving careful consideration to arguments from both sides, I decided to vote against The Bill late last year.
This decision was one of the hardest I have faced in politics, and I recognise that desire to change the law on assisted dying comes from a place of compassion. I also understand the desire for autonomy and choice.
One of my chief duties as a legislator, however, is to pass safe laws that protect the most vulnerable from coercion and abuse. I do not consider the amendments in The Bill sufficient to address my concerns about the safety and effectiveness of assisted dying.
I am, however, convinced that, for people who are dying, it is critical they have reliable access to high quality, specialist palliative care. This is not currently available to all who need it and is something for which I will continue to advocate.